Archaeological Tile Brick and Pot
  • Services Offered
    • Post Excavation Assessment
    • Analysis/ Publication Report
    • Contact Me
    • Links
    • CBM Resources
  • Publications
    • CV
  • Blog
    • Finds Forum
  • Gallery
    • All Reports
    • Roman Pottery Projects
    • Tile Kilns
    • Fabrics
  • Research Interests
    • Roman Economy
    • The status of ceramic roof tile
    • Integrating urban and rural settlement
    • Ceramiscene
    • Long Distance Trade in CBM
    • Ras El Bassit
  • Definitions
    • Ware Class
    • Form Function

signatures

7/1/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture


I have been asked to supply some slides for a public lecture based on some of my thoughts on the work I did in Sagalassos last summer.

One of the things that struck me about the assemblage was the range and complexity of the signatures compared to the sites that I usually deal with. There are a number of caveats of course – the material I was looking at was from over a decade’s worth of excavation and only the most complete examples were present. Normally I only have fragment of signatures to deal with - but sometimes I get interesting complete examples, such as this example from a site in Cambridgeshire, which is alos noted at Piddington villa



P signature from Turners hall farm , Cambridgeshire ( work commissioned by Hereford Archaeological Trust)







Normally a signature is found on tegula and has been made using a finger or a stick by the tile maker at the end of the shaping process and when the tile is left for primary drying.  Looking at Shawn Grahams Ex Figlinis I find they must be related to Anepigraphic stamps  - in as much that there is a small range of signatures commonly repeated – so it is a device which has meaning in a specific place and for a short time, of which the most obvious is to identify the tiles made by a specific tile maker when it goes into the kiln ( where several tile makers use the same kiln),  Or to identify the fired tiles of a specific tile maker.  Normally less than 0.1% of the assemblage appears to have any traces of a signature – although I will have to go through my database and check so that I can get proper figures by form type and fabric, so about 1 tie in every 1000 is marked in this way – which nicely agrees with the proportion of relief pattern tiles I found in Leicester shire hall – so we are looking at say one tile in 1000 marked in this way.  One can imagine that tiles are stacked in a kiln to allow batches to be easily differentiated, although I can imagine the logistics could be fraught id more than a couple of tilemakers are using the same kiln, This may explain ( in addition to sampling error) why I have some groups with high signature rates – where kiln design or capacity meant that tile makers had to sign a lot more of their products in order to reclaim the right ones after firing.

Currently I have no numbers for the levels of signed tiles at Sagalassos , but the variation in designs are interesting, as well as the relationship to other markings ( stamps in particular) all suggest a complex economic sector which is organised somewhat differently than those in Britain, Italy or the Levant.


0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Phil Mills

    I am a finds specialist, working on Roman and Medeival CBM as well as Roman pottery. I a based in Britain but work all over the area of the ancient classical world, including, to date, Lebanon, Syria,Bulgaria Tunisia and Italy

    Categories

    All
    Animal
    Brick
    Cbm
    Conference
    Development Of Capatiism
    Digital Archaeology
    Digital Musuem
    Economics
    General
    Markings
    Modern
    Roman

    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Archives

    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    December 2014
    July 2014
    July 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.